HomeArticles2022 No.3Details

Research on the promotion of clinical practice guidelines implementation (V): evalua-tion of clinical guidelines implementation and expert consensus on Traditional Chinese Medicine/Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine

Update:Mar. 25, 2022Total Views:1001Total Downloads:1184 DownloadMobile

Author: Hong-Yan LI 1 Xiu-Qing SHI 2 Jing GUO 3 Rong ZHANG 4 Jie ZHOU 5 Ying-Hui JIN 6 Hong-Cai SHANG 7

Affiliation: 1. Department of Pharmacy, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai 264000, Shandong Province, China 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai 264000, Shandong Province, China 3. Department of Acupuncture and Rehabilitation, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medi-cine, Nanjing 210029, China 4. Department of Neurological Tumor Center, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, Hubei Province, China 5. School of Nursing, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China 6. Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China 7. Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education and Beijing, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China

Keywords: Traditional Chinese Medicine Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Clinical guidelines Expert consensus Implementation

DOI:10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202112031

Reference:Li HY, Shi XQ, Guo J, Zhang R, Zhou J, Jin YH, Shang HC. Research on the promotion of clinical practice guidelines implementation (V): evaluation of clinical guidelines implementation and expert consensus on Traditional Chinese Medicine/Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine[J]. Yixue Xinzhi Zazhi, 2022, 32(3): 161-169. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202112031.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • Figures and Tables
  • References
Abstract

Objective  Evaluate the quality of implementation of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM)/Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine (IM) clinical guidelines and expert con-sensus published at home and abroad using the “Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) implementation evaluation tool”, understand the implementation of TCM/IM CPGs and expert consensus, provide a ref-erence for TCM/IM guidelines implementation and promotion. 

Methods  CNKI, Wanfang Data, PubMed, and Medive databases were systematically searched, to collect original TCM/IM guidelines/consensus. The “CPG implementation evaluation tool” was applied to evaluate the implementation of the included TCM/IM guidelines. 

Results  A total of 231 guidelines/consensus were included, consisting of 119 guidelines and 112 expert consensus. In general, the implementation quality of most TCM/IM guide-lines/consensus is low (90.91%). 

Conclusion  The implementation of TCM/TCM CPGs/expert consen-sus still needs to be improved. Incorporating implementation science into the guideline formulation process, managing and guiding formulation from the source, and optimizing the presentation and dis-semination strategies of the guidelines can promote the implementation of guidelines/consensus appli-cation.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.World Health Organization. Guidelines for methodologies on research and evaluation of traditional medicine[EB/OL]. General: WHO, 2000. (2000) [2022-01-12]. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=B5E0FBC7CA3052D09334E5DB9C7F53E1?doi=10.1.1.384.9417&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

2.World Health Organization. WHO traditional medicine strategy 2002-2005[EB/OL]. General: WHO, 2002. (2012-11-17) [2022-01-12]. https://tailieu.vn/doc/who-traditional-medicine-strategy-2002- 2005-1288033.html.

3.陈耀龙, 罗旭飞, 王吉耀, 等. 如何区分临床实践指南与专家共识[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2019, 10(4): 403-408. [Chen YL, Luo XF, Wang JY, et al. How to distinguish between clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2019, 10(4): 403-408.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081. 2019.04.018.

4.李承羽, 赵晨, 陈耀龙, 等. 中医药临床指南/共识中推荐意见分级标准的制订[J]. 中医杂志, 2020, 61(6): 486-492. [Li CY, Zhao C, Chen YL, et al. Development of grading criteria on recom-mendations in clinical guidelines/consensus for Traditional Chinese Medicine[J]. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2020, 61(6): 486-492.] DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2020.06.008.

5.陈耀龙, 周奇, 崔荣荣, 等. 基于AGREEⅡ的中医药临床指南质量评价[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2016, 16(11): 1331-1337. [Chen YL, Zhou Q, Cui RR, et al. Quality evaluation of Traditional Chi-nese Medicine guidelines based on AGREE Ⅱ instrument[J]. Chinese Journal of Evi-dence-Based Medicine, 2016, 16(11): 1331-1337.] DOI: 10.7507/1672-2531.20160201.

6.靳英辉, 赵志慧, 黄粲然, 等. 临床实践指南实施性评价工具的研制和验证评价[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2022, 22(1): 111-119. [Jin YH, Zhao ZH, Huang CR, et al. Development and validation for evaluation of an evaluation tool for guideline implementation[J]. Chinese Journal of Evi-dence-Based Medicine, 2022, 22(1): 111-119.] DOI: 10.7507/1672-2531.202106002.

7.李慧, 陈耀龙, 杜亮, 等. 促进循证中医药指南制定的策略与建议:广州宣言[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2016, 16(7): 745-748. [Li H, Chen YL, Du L, et al. Strategies and recommendations to pro-mote the development of evidence-based traditional Chinese medicine guidelines: Guangzhou declaration[J]. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2016, 16(7): 745-748.] DOI: 10.7507/1672-2531.20160115.

8.赵国桢, 冯硕, 张霄潇, 等. 中医药临床实践指南:现状和思考[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2018, 18(12): 1386-1390. [Zhao GZ, Feng S, Zhang XX, et al. Clinical practice guideline of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM): status and thought[J]. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medi-cine, 2018, 18(12): 1386-1390.] DOI: 10.7507/1672-2531.201804187.

9.赵国桢, 陈腾飞, 郭玉红, 等. 混合方法研究制定中医药临床实践指南及实例解读[J]. 中国全科医学, 2021, 24(32): 4155-4159. [Zhao GZ, Chen TF, Guo YH, et al. Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine clinical practice guidelines using mixed methods and example inter-pretation[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(32): 4155-4159.] DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.01. 215.

10.Kastner M, Bhattacharyya O, Hayden L, et al. Guideline uptake is influenced by six imple-mentability domains for creating and communicating guidelines: a realist review[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2015, 68(5): 498-509. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.013.

11.Bierbaum M, Rapport F, Arnolda G, et al. Clinicians' attitudes and perceived barriers and facilitators to cancer treatment clinical practice guideline adherence: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative literature[J]. Implement Sci, 2020, 15(1): 39. DOI: 10.118 6/s13012-020-00991-3.

12.Hultcrantz M, Rind D, Akl EA, et al. The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2017, 87: 4-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi. 2017.05.006.

13.Alonso-Coello P, Oxman AD, Moberg J, et al. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frame-works: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: clinical practice guidelines[J]. BMJ, 2016, 353: i2089. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i2089.

14.Sarkies MN, Jones LK, Gidding SS, et al. Improving clinical practice guidelines with imple-mentation science[J]. Nat Rev Cardiol, 2022, 19(1): 3-4. DOI: 10.1038/s41569-021-00645-x.

15.Jin Y, Li Z, Han F, et al. Barriers and enablers for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in China: a mixed-method study[J]. BMJ Open, 2019, 9(9): e026328. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026328.

16.Jin YH, Tan LM, Khan KS, et al. Determinants of successful guideline implementation: a na-tional cross-sectional survey[J]. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 2021, 21(1): 19. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-01382-w.

Hot Papers